BlueStacks was using around 2.4 to 3 GBs of memory when BlueStacks was around 100 – 500 MBs. One thing to note here is that WSA takes a huge amount of RAM compared to BlueStacks. Both WSA and BlueStacks are good when it comes to doing the basic tasks, be it using the supported Android apps or watching videos, there is nothing to complain about. You see, the better an is optimized, the smoother it will run. Some might think that Performance depends greatly on the device’s hardware, which is true but not entirely. Since you are running android natively on Windows, you will get all the Android apps thanks to PlayStore.Īlso Read: How to get Instagram or Snapchat on Windows PC. Whereas on BlueStacks, there is no such issue. But there is a catch, since, WSA doesn’t have GMS or Google Mobile Service, app collection is very limited, and even if you manage to sideload apps, some of them won’t work because of the lack of GMS.

You can sideload Android apps to work on Windows 11, but that’s a workaround. However, Windows Subsystem for Android doesn’t run Google Apps and services natively. What’s the app availability situation on both corners? As you may already know, BlueStacks runs android apps natively on Windows, it’s not easy to miss this feature as that’s what their marketing is based on. Let us start with something you would want to know right off the bat. In this battle of Windows Subsystem for Android vs BlueStacks, we will compare them on the following parameters. Windows Subsystem for Android vs BlueStacks comparision So, put your reading glasses on and start reading. With the introduction of the Windows Subsystem for Android, there is a big question that needs to be answered, which is Windows Subsystem for Andriod vs BlueStacks, which one is better? In this post, we are on a mission to find the answer to this question. If you are a long-time Android and Windows user, you must be familiar with BlueStacks, an Andoird emulator that lets you run Android apps on a Windows computer.

Bluestacks android emulator windows